Analysis of the validity of the test Planea EMS 2017, mathematical area

Authors

  • M. A. León Pérez Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica Tonantzintla, Puebla, México
  • J. J. Báez Rojas Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica Tonantzintla, Puebla, México
  • M. G. Corona-Galindo Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica Tonantzintla, Puebla, México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61174/recacym.v9i1.16

Keywords:

standardized tests, multiple choice items, matrix, validity, Planea test

Abstract

The standardized tests are developed for making objective comparisons between students in different contexts and they are applied on a large scale. The validity, reliability, application-ease, and qualification are necessary characteristics for a test to be objective. Validity is the condition that is fully satisfied when a test measures that for which it was designed; to achieve this, each item must have a unique and unmistakable answer, besides, it must be written in a clear, precise language and in accordance with the level and capacity of the student which takes the exam. Hence the relevance of the present work; since, the analysis that it is carried out, suggests that being the Plan Nacional para la Evaluación de los Aprendizajes (Planea) an instrument which evaluates a whole country, it should not have errors in the construction of the test nor in its reagents. On the basis of a set of guidelines, a matrix is proposed to qualify the validity of any multiple-choice test and it is applied to the Planea school examination in 2017 on the mathematics area only, finding that 10% of the items of such test have errors.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-25

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Analysis of the validity of the test Planea EMS 2017, mathematical area. (2017). El cálculo Y Su enseñanza, 9(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.61174/recacym.v9i1.16